TRUTH ABOUT FUKUSHIMA PUBLISHED BY UFO BILLY MEIER...DAYS AFTER EVENT OCCURRED

While it is just now beginning to come to light, the true – and as yet still unreported – terrible magnitude of the Fukushima disaster was first told to, and reported by, UFO contactee Billy Meier just days after it occurred.

In the days, weeks…and for generations to come, the world will not only come to realize, but also be plagued by, the awful truth.

Even so, many people are still barely be able to comprehend was has occurred and is unstoppably unfolding. So, for those interested persons who are finally ready to flush all the time wasting, “UFO-contactee-alien-abduction-ascension” disinformation down the drain, so that the long suppressed truth can come to light…now’s the time.

For over a decade I have referred to the Billy Meier case and its information as the key to our future survival. If you are among those who are finally ready to find out why, then you’ll find volumes of free information at my site and blog.

And, among many things, you may then wish to contemplate this information:

July 25, 2013, 7:54 AM: “…when the prophecies prove to be true”

…and consider what you can do to help awaken humankind to the assistance that’s long been freely offered to us.

You may also wonder just why the “UFO community” has fought so long and hard to suppress the truth about the singular authenticity of Billy Meier's 70+ years of extraterrestrial contacts.

Especially since they…know that it’s true.

View the original article here

FUKUSHIMA: TICKING TIME BOMB OF DEATH - PART II

If you missed Part I of this article click here.

These maps based on 2008 data, are maps of earthquake damage risk in the United States. The highest risk areas are purple, red and orange. Some nuclear plants sit near fault lines and/or in quake zones. (Maps from U.S. Geological Survey)

Those who still say that the Chernobyl disaster was worse than Fukushima may also want to consider that a Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution study conducted in October 2011 concluded that Fukushima had already released up to 100 times more radiation into the environment than Chernobyl at that time. Today, this amount is likely astronomically higher, especially taking into account all the airborne radioactive plumes that have been detected billowing across the ocean and over U.S. soil.

What can we do about this, you ask? Precious little. However, should we stick our heads in the sand entirely and not even be aware of it? Should we blindly, happily follow the near blackout on the subject by the government and the main stream media? Should we dumb-down ourselves and die a slow death?

There is something we can do, although it will not stop the deadly march of Fukushima’s radiation: We can oppose the building of any new nuclear power stations, oppose the creation of any new weapons having depleted uranium or any nuclear signature and oppose any use of atomic energy.

Are we sitting on a new Fukushima? How about San Onofre Nuclear Installation in Southern California? San Onofre has been shut down several times recently with strange problems apparently connected to new conduits having faulty construction. San Onofre sits on top of an active earthquake fault.  San Onofre is not in the list below because this list is for ONLY central and eastern U.S. nuclear installations; I am publishing it simply to give you a sample of the threat. This list takes into account proximity, severity and frequency of earthquakes around each east coast or central U.S. installation and also the type of rock or soilupon which the installation is built. Data is also available for western reactors on the NRC’s website.

The Top Ten 

Here are the 10 nuclear power sites with the highest risk of an earthquake causing core damage to nuclear reactors, showing their NRC risk estimates based on 2008 and 1989 geological data. 

1. Indian Point 3, Buchanan, N.Y.: 1 in 10,000 chance each year. Old estimate: 1 in 17,241. Increase in risk: 72 percent.

2. Pilgrim 1, Plymouth, Mass.: 1 in 14,493. Old estimate: 1 in 125,000. Increase in risk: 763 percent.

3. Limerick 1 and 2, Limerick, Pa.: 1 in 18,868. Old estimate: 1 in 45,455. Increase in risk: 141 percent.

4. Sequoyah 1 and 2, Soddy-Daisy, Tenn.: 1 in 19,608. Old estimate: 1 in 102,041. Increase in risk: 420 percent.

5. Beaver Valley 1, Shippingport, Pa.: 1 in 20,833. Old estimate: 1 in 76,923. Increase in risk: 269 percent.

6. Saint Lucie 1 and 2, Jensen Beach, Fla.: 1 in 21,739. Old estimate: N/A.

7. North Anna 1 and 2, Louisa, Va.: 1 in 22,727. Old estimate: 1 in 31,250. Increase in risk: 38 percent.

8. Oconee 1, 2 and 3, Seneca, S.C.: 1 in 23,256. Old estimate: 1 in 100,000. Increase in risk: 330 percent.

9. Diablo Canyon 1 and 2, Avila Beach, Calif.: 1 in 23,810. Old estimate: N/A.

10. Three Mile Island, Middletown, Pa.: 1 in 25,000. Old estimate: 1 in 45,455. Increase in risk: 82 percent.

What was the chance Fukushima Daiichi would get hit by a 9.0 quake, followed by a devastating tsunami? The odds were LESS than some of these odds! There is an old saying, “Sh—happens.” As long as humankind plays around with nuclear disaster, nuclear disaster will happen. 

Is this what we want for ourselves, our children, our grandchilren and our planet? Nuclear accidents, let alone nuclear warfare, spell certain death for us and our planet. The People of Earth must change this looming reality – or die.

“THE UFO AGENDA, SO…YOU WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH?”

View the original article here

It's Official Now - Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Found In US Food [del.icio.us]

Update: Yet again Facebook censored our article, particularly in U.S. by deleting comments, wall posts and even forcing its user to enter security text code prior to posting the article link on their wall.

Thanks to the jet stream air currents that flow across the Pacific Ocean, the U.S. is receiving a steady flow of radiation from Fukushima Daichi. And while many scientists say that the levels of contamination in food pose no significant threat to health, scientists are unable to establish any actual safe limit for radiation in food. Detection of radioactive iodine 131, which degrades rapidly, in California milk samples shows that the fallout from Japan is reaching the U.S. quickly."

"Milk, fruits and vegetables show trace amounts of radioactive isotopes from the Fukushima Daichi power plants, and the media appears to be paying scant attention, if any attention at all. It is as if the problem only involves Japan, not the vast Pacific Ocean, into which highly radioactive water has poured by the dozens of tons, and not into air currents and rainwater that carry radiation to U.S. soil and to the rest of the world."

"Radiation tests conducted since the nuclear disaster in Japan have detected radioactive iodine and cesium in milk and vegetables produced in California. According to tests conducted by scientists at the UC Berkeley Department of Nuclear Engineering, milk from grass fed cows in Sonoma County was contaminated with cesium 137 and cesium 134. Milk sold in Arizona, Arkansas, Hawaii, Vermont and Washington has also tested positive for radiation since the accident."

"Additionally, drinking water tested in some U.S. municipalities also shows radioactive contamination. Is the fallout from Fukushima Daichi falling on us? Yes, it is."

“Children are much more susceptible to the effects of radiation and stand a much greater chance of developing cancer than adults,” states Andrew Kanter, MD, president of PSR’s board. “So it is particularly dangerous when they consume radioactive food or water.” - Fox News

Radioactive Milk: Strontium Found in Hilo, Hawaii Milk

Last month we had also reported how a radioactive isotope of strontium had already been detected in American milk sample from Hilo, Hawaii. EPA found 1.4 picoCuries per liter of strontium-89 in a milk sample collected in Hilo on April 4, 2011
Although the EPA tests milk, the FDA regulates it, and the FDA’s Derived Intervention Level—the standard observed for food—is 4,400 pCi/L for strontium-90. I’m working to confirm whether FDA has a separate DIL for Sr-89.

The EPA’s Maximum Contamination Level for Sr-89 in drinking water is 20 pCi/L. (For more on the difference between EPA and FDA standards, see “Why Does FDA Tolerate More Radiation Than EPA?“)

The two man-made isotopes of strontium—Sr-89 and Sr-90—are among the most dangerous products of nuclear fission to human and animal health. Both are “bone-seekers,” chemically similar to calcium, that collect in bone and marrow, where they are known to cause cancer. They are particularly dangerous to the growing bones of fetuses and children.
The half-life of Sr-89 is 50.5 days, and Sr-89 is sometimes used as a cancer pain treatment under the commercial name Metastron, because it collects in and destroys the fast-growing cells of bone cancer. EPA considers Sr-90, meanwhile, “the most important radioactive isotope in the environment” because of its health impacts and a longer half-life of 29 years.

View the original article here